The #1 objection — answered

Spaid vs. Traditional Consulting

Operators who’ve been burned by consultants ask this first. Here’s the honest answer: the engagement starts the same way — an engineer on-site, learning your operation. What’s different is what happens after.

What Consulting Gets Wrong

A binder on a shelf doesn’t change how your techs run jobs.

Recommendations Without Systems

Consultants identify problems and write recommendations. Nobody builds the system that enforces them. Six months later, the binder is on a shelf and the operation runs the same way.

Benchmarks Instead of Your Data

Most consultants compare you to industry averages. The meaningful comparison is your best tech vs. your worst tech on the same job type — and that requires pulling your actual FSM data, not applying generic benchmarks.

No Measurement After They Leave

The engagement ends, the invoice is paid, and there’s no system measuring whether anything actually changed. Margin drift creeps back. Callbacks return to baseline. Nobody notices until the quarterly P&L.

Side by Side

What you get from each — and what you don’t.

DimensionTraditional ConsultingSpaid
ScopeWhatever the firm specializes in — usually field OR back of house, not bothFull operation: field ops + back of house + the handoffs between them
Who does the workJunior analysts with a partner who shows up for presentationsA single engineer who embeds with your team for 30 days — rides along, listens to calls, sits with dispatch
Knowledge sourceIndustry benchmarks and the firm’s past engagementsYour best tech’s actual execution, your best CSR’s actual call patterns, your actual FSM data
What you receiveA slide deck with recommendationsA quantified revenue map, an operational knowledge graph, and a running platform
After the engagementThey leave. You implement (or don’t).The platform stays. Drift detection, call analysis, pricing guardrails — month-to-month, cancel anytime.
MeasurementBefore/after snapshot (if you’re lucky)Weekly drift detection against the baseline your best people set
Pricing$150K–$500K project fees$45K audit with $200K guarantee, then month-to-month platform
RiskFull fee regardless of findingsIf the audit doesn’t find $200K in recoverable revenue, you pay nothing
What Spaid Actually Does

Same starting point. Different system.

Days
1–30

Embed and Quantify

Your engineer rides along with your top tech and your average tech. Listens to your best CSR and your worst. Pulls 6–12 months of FSM data. Every gap gets a dollar value. If we don’t find $200K, you pay nothing.

Days
31–60

Build the System

Your top performers’ knowledge becomes AI-driven standards: pricing guardrails, coaching scripts, follow-up automation, onboarding systems. Not a binder — a platform.

Days
61–90

Measure Convergence

Drift detection goes live. Every tech and every CSR measured weekly against the standard your best people set. The system runs inside your existing FSM — no new login, no adoption problem.

The Guarantee

$45K audit. If we don’t find $200K, you pay nothing.

The Full-Operation Audit maps every revenue leak — field and back of house — in 30 days. If we don’t identify at least $200,000 in recoverable annual revenue, we refund the audit in full. You keep every deliverable.

Zero risk. The audit is the entry point to the platform.
Start Here

$45K audit. $200K guarantee.
Your engineer is on-site within 14 days.

We’ll review a recent export from your FSM and call system, show you the biggest leaks, and scope the audit. If the numbers make sense, your engineer is on-site within 14 days.

$20M–$100M+ revenue · 40–120+ techs · Any modern FSM or ERP · Month-to-month, cancel anytime